Category Archives: Immigration Issues

Let’s Be Real, Arizona SB 1070 Is Quite Unambiguously Racist

... declare that the media pushes "a world in which every voice proclaims the equality of the races, the inerrant nature of the Jewish 'Holocaust' tale, the wickedness of attempting to halt the flood of non-White aliens pouring across our borders"

I’m not even talking racist like “there are correlations between racist attitudes and advocating ‘tough-on-crime’ criminal justice policies” or “beliefs about social spending are heavily correlated with levels of social heterogeneity” or even “attitudes towards blacks are strong indicators of attitudes towards social spending and supposedly ‘non-racial’ issues” (which, by the way, makes this and this, uh, really telling).

No, I mean SB 1070 was straight up initiated by a legislator who admires White supremacists and neo-Nazi sympathizers.  I mean, duh.

There exists respectful disagreement on immigration and domestic policy and then there are people who have no respect for human dignity outside of the boundaries of their tribe.  This is distinctly the latter, it is un-Christian, un-American, and barbaric.

Peace,
Joel

Leave a Comment

Filed under Immigration Issues, Racial Justice Issues

Last Week’s March for America

I couldn't agree more

And here’s Obama’s remote video address (I hear there was a big vote that day) to the crowd:

This post is later than I had hoped, and there’s already been a lot of great coverage (and here are more shots and videos from RaceWire.org, which I link to primarily throughout this article because you should check them out, they’re good), so I’ll try to keep this brief, limited to my own impressions, links to those who know more than me, and musings about what it indicates going forward.

Anyway, I attended the March for America the weekend before last, for comprehensive immigration reform.  For some background, there are a couple bills that have been introduced in the House and are considered, as far as I can tell in my brief survey of the blogosphere and talking with folks at the rally to be pretty good: the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act, which would provide minors with paths to permanent residency, and the Comprehensive Immigration Reform for Americas Safety And Prosperity (CIR ASAP) Act, which would address security issues, provide a path to citizenship, and reform existing temporary work visa programs particularly for agricultural workers.  Then there’s the Senate bill being proposed by Chuck Schumer and Lindsey Graham (he’s just a bipartisan fucking wiz-kid ain’t he?) which is being viewed somewhat skeptically.  Oh and by the way, for reference, last year we deported 387,790 people, mostly non-criminals, at great cost and moral travesty to all, so this is getting to be kinda urgent.

Overall, I thought the march was completely awesome.

Some of this was, I’ll fully admit, kind of selfish.  I love protests in general, and find that in the best of circumstances while they may not in and of themselves force politicians to take decisive action, they can serve to energize a base.  And that they did, at least in the short term, with the usual panoply of drumming, dancing, and outbreaks of chants of ‘Si, Se Puede’ (Yes We Can, by way of Cesar Chavez originally) and ‘Obama, escucha, estamos en la lucha’ (Obama, listen, we are in the fight/struggle or we are fighting).  It was a very good time, really celebratory while not overriding the urgency and life or death nature of the struggle.  But you know, granted I’m biased, but as Mike Lux put it, there’s one side of this that is full of hope and aspiration, another that strikes me as driven by fear and anger.  Which one is more persuasive?  I was standing by the threshold to the parking lot holding hundreds of buses and the crowd was continuing the march, singing dancing, laughing, meeting folks from all over for hours as we tried to get out of DC.  The energy was electrifying and very compelling.

All that is to say that if organizers and those who go to protests stay committed (granted, a tall order) to an issue sustainably, they can do a lot for ensuring ‘action returns’ in the future.  The organizers of the March drew folks’ attention to call-ins to Senators and Representatives the next day, and further local actions on the 10th.  I was very pumped by the energy of the event but also for how its strategy differed from that we’ve seen from the health care front.

The thing that most impressed me though was a factor that was kind of inherent in the March.  Whereas it often felt during the health care process that us progressives spent most of our time following the leadership’s agenda and really just trimming the edges of what was going on (albeit with some decent but insufficient concessions here and there), and in the case of climate we’re just at a loss as to how to respond to the next fiasco, the March for America’s whole point was to take an item that had seemingly been stricken from the agenda and put it back on the plate.  And they did so by directly making the case that Obama has made promises that remain unfulfilled, and he will be held accountable for them.  I saw numerous signs like the one above, to say nothing of the number of people chanting Si, Se Puede and Obama, escucha, estamos en la lucha, which strike me as fairly direct rebukes to being ignored.  Folks know where responsibility is to be laid.

This is, while acknowledging the occasionally muddled messaging, exactly the kind of precedent we need to set.  We were out in force, advocating for an issue that is urgent and we received assurances would be addressed.  We (or the organizers) saw that government is abdicating its responsibility and going the wrong way and needs to be righted.  This is a pretty good indicator of where we need to go (though as the above link notes, it seems like the organizers of the March were a bit more conciliatory than many would like to the Schumer-Graham framework, which does need vigilant attention).

As I’ll detail in a future post (I’m really trying to get back into a good regular schedule), I think that with the passage of health care reform we’re at another ‘where do we go from here?’ moment.  The March for America, for its fault, was an invigorating nudge in the right direction.

Peace,
Joel

Leave a Comment

Filed under Immigration Issues, Movements

Tom Tancredo Is A Steaming Pile Of Racist, Elitist Shit

Tom Tancredo on a charming day

Tom Tancredo: Obama Elected Because ‘We Do Not Have A Civic, Literacy Test’ To Vote

This is of course, resemblant of the old property requirements, poll taxes and stringent voting restrictions that effectively disenfranchised the majority of the Black community until the mid-60′s.

But of course, disenfranchisement continues today- and Tancredo is right to fear wider voting (aka, more democracy), because it would suck for Conservatives.  I link here to a really good piece on how ex-offender restrictions and disengagement by low-income people and people of color dramatically skews our electorate.  Let’s not even get into what liberty for undocumented immigrants would do for both our labor movement and our democracy.

Of course Tancredo hates democracy and the empowerment of cross-class-race voters- it doesn’t work particularly well for him.

Peace,
Joel

1 Comment

Filed under Authoritarianism, Douchebaggery, Immigration Issues, Racial Justice Issues

350 Alert: Climate Change Already Happening

No wonder they managed to get 15,000 people to a 350 rally in Ethiopia.

LA Times has a harrowing story up about how climate change is already exacerbating Africa’s refugee crisis.  Their figure for the number of refugees whose status can be attributed to climate change driven drought (1o million) does not even account for the wars that are already being fought over that drought in the Sahel and other arid regions.  This 10 million figure ought to be considered a low-end estimate for climate refugees, as conflict (like that in Sudan, Chad, Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Central Asia, and anywhere that depends on a glacier for water) becomes increasingly tied to climate change.

How does this affect us (in case international misery isn’t enought to get you incensed)?  Paul Rosenberg at OpenLeft had a piece up yesterday about the national security implications of climate change.  Despair, frustration, and resentment borne of climate change will continue to produce blooms of conflict- conflict the likes of which we’re currently spending billions dealing with every day.  Billions spent on conflict (to say nothing of the war-dead) saps our will and ability to deal with domestic ‘issues’ like energy, health, and education reform that demand attnetion if we are to maintain anything resembling a secure livelihood.  As I mentioned in the caption of one of the 350 pictures I found yesterday, the national security community cannot afford to bullshit on climate change.  They know that we are in for a world of conflict if climate change gets as bad as it could, if we don’t prevent the worst from happening now.

And of course, it bears repeating that the people who are already beginning to suffer the most had the least to do with contributing to this problem, and have received next to nothing of the benefits from industrialization and first-world development.  Climate change is happening now, and it’s happening to those who had nothing to do with bringing it on.  Those people know where the blame lies.

Call your congresspeople, senators and President Obama every day demanding a recognition of a 350 ppm target.  I’m not even addressing whether that’s politically feasible.  The public option wasn’t politically feasible until we made it so, and now the administration and Democratic leaders are shitting a brick trying to figure out how to avoid responsibility for it.  Changing what’s politically feasible officially starts now.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Environmental Justice, Foreign Policy, Global Warming and Poverty, Immigration Issues, Sustainable Development, Violence

Walgreens FAIL! Update: Retailers Target And Walgreens Are Dropping The Costume. In Other News, Fox Is Staffed By Morons

[Update At Bottom: Even More Halloween Foolishness I Found At Racialicious]

Good looks folks, Walgreens and Target have, at the very least, dropped the ‘illegal alien’ costume. Of course, they issued the classic non-commital apology, displaying they have no idea why the costume was offensive, they just want to avoid the fuss:

Target halted sales. “It was never our intent to offend the consumers with the products we offer,” Target said in a statement.

Walgreens spokeswoman Vivika Vergara said the costume was never in its stores and was pulled from its Web site. “We received feedback from customers and decided it was best to stop carrying it so it would not be subject to varied interpretation,” she said in an e-mail message.

Bravo, I’m glad offending customers isn’t franchise policy.  While it’s possible the “I’m sorry we released a product that is dehumanizing towards HUMAN BEINGS, and offended an already brutalized and persecuted population” apology got lost in the mail, I’m going to interpret this as another case of people completely avoiding anything like responsibility for their actions.  Below the jump, Steve Doocy  and Michael Steele lack faculties resembling common sense!

Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under FAIL!, Immigration Issues, Racial Justice Issues, The Media

Walgreens FAIL! Way To Cash In By Dehumanizing Undocumented Immigrants, Assholes

I really hope someone gets fired for this.

And I told them so, here.

You should too.

Update: I’m including a promotion.  I will buy a beer for anyone who writes to Walgreens and posts what they wrote in the comments.

1 Comment

Filed under Calling Out Corporate Bull, FAIL!, Immigration Issues, Racial Issues, Write-Ins

Geographies Of Displacement: Losang Rabgey Of Machik, A Tibetan Development Organization

What’s good yall? I went to an absolutely amazing talk yesterday for the Geographies of Displacement Symposium with Losang Rabgey, the director of a Tibetan development NGO and model school. I sometimes have the tendency to get down, frustrated, and cynical about prospects for social, economic and environmental change and find myself in need of a pick-me-up or hopeful story, and Machik fit the bill completely. Even more though, it had some valuable and provocative lessons to take home as I continue to think about my best, most appropriate role as an activist.

There was so much going on in her talk (and she is an extremely gifted speaker) that I can’t hope to bring out everything from the story she told, so I’ll try and hit the basics. She started off by laying the groundwork and background information, describing the Chinese occupation, conditions on the ground, internal displacement (cultural alienation, a turn to self-destructive behavior and poverty, and a growing urban migration pattern), and the state of the diaspora. As she described it, while the earlier generation was made up of exiles who had been raised in Tibet, the new generation has become a full-fledged diaspora with a globalized, pluralized, pan-Tibetan identity, for the most part uninterested in return but still very invested in the homeland’s welfare. Much of this new generation, if not in the diaspora, was brought up in a Chinese assimilationist context, in which Tibetans were encouraged to join the mainstream culture and abandon the Tibetan ‘traditional’ culture. But according to Rabgey this had the opposite effect, fostering cultural resistance and an enhanced Tibetan identity. Many advocates for Tibetan development and autonomy come out of this Chinese-educated group, and they’ve started online communities to connect and discuss freedom, leadership, and autonomy, and have started advocating for Tibetan schools for Tibetans living in core China (like Beijing.)

Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Democracy, Education Issues, Events, Gender Issues, Immigration Issues, Racial Issues, Service, Solidarity, Sustainable Development

Geographies Of Displacement Symposium This Week

What’s good yall? Just a quick post to let you know that there’s a series of talks this week that looks really interesting on geographies of displacement. Understanding these trends is incredibly important among other things because they will be enormously exacerbated by climate change (sorry, it’s been like five days since I mentioned it, I think I’ve been pretty good lately), which produces refugees from flooded, drought-stricken, and wildfire prone areas as well as violent conflict like that seen in the Sahel, Southern Africa, and Southeast Asia.

The first talk is tonight at 8:00 in West Lecture Hall, by Njabulo Ndebele of South Africa, looks at the experience of returning home after apartheid. Much of the destructiveness of apartheid lay in the government’s control of space, its delineation of ‘bantustans’, shifting of peoples’ territories, forced displacements, checkpoints and pass requirements. The reclamation of space after such hateful constrictions is something I think we can learn from as we consider future social trends.

If, like me, you can’t make the one tonight and want to check out others, there are a full six more for the rest of the week. On Wednesday there’s a lunch conversation in Wilder 115 with Losang Rabgey, the Co-Founder and Executive Director of a non-profit working for education, capacity-building, and innovation on the Tibetan plateau, and a talk at 4:30 in King 106 by Sophie Richardson, the advocacy director of Human Rights Watch’s Asia Division. On Thursday at 4:30 there’s a reading at the Oberlin Public Library by a poet, Tsering Wangmo Dhompa, from India and Nepal. On Friday at noon in Wilder 215 there’s a very interesting talk for you anthropologists (and green jobs advocates) out there on doing community service and internships in indigenous communities. That day there’s also a talk at 4:30 in King 106 on resistance and activism by Phyllis Young, a Lakota/Dakota activist from the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. She’ll be talking about damage done to communities by the Oahe Dam and Oil Pipeline projects, of especial interest to anthropologists and environmental justice activists (so yeah, I’ll be there.) And finally, on Saturday, we’ll be welcoming back OC alum Ishmael Beah at 2:00 in Hallock Auditorium (Environmental Studies building) to talk about the identity of language.

Hopefully I and some others will be attending a few of these talks and can report back on them for those who don’t get to see them. I’m especially interested in doing the two Friday ones (though that is the day Marcy Kaptur is here,) but if anyone else would like to go to those or other talks and report back on them that’d be great. I spend too much time on this blog (nah…)

Peace yall, happy Monday.

-Joel

Leave a Comment

Filed under Democracy, Environmental Justice, Genocide, Immigration Issues, Racial Issues, Violence

University Of Toledo Environmental Justice Townhall Meeting, The Citizen Tesimonials (Part 2)

In the previous post we saw the introduction to the Toledo environmental justice townhall, with some background on Ohio’s unfortunate environmental past and something of a more hopeful future embedded in prospects for an environmental justice bill. Now we move into the most substantial section of the meeting: the citizens’ accounts of specific current environmental justice struggles from around Northwest Ohio.

After the introductions we got into the meeting’s meat, the citizen testimonials, a time for testifying. Again, I’d like to emphasize the churchy vibe of the whole event, with citizens testifying and Morris Jenkins even referencing his own church history (I think his father was a preacher.) This is clearly a foundation and source of strength for much of the environmental justice community, as it was to the civil rights and justice community of the 50′s and 60′s. The moral authority and clarity of the group was on full display, and was wielded (in my opinion) much more effectively than it has been in typical liberal activist circles. God wasn’t referenced particularly often; it was almost unstated that just as the church might be the base for a community, so too is the struggle for security, health, and justice. It was extremely subtle, much more so I think than it was back in the civil rights era, but undeniably present and powerful.

Most of the testimony came from prepared remarks by activists and state legislators of various stripes, but there was also time at the end in which the floor was opened up to anyone who had something to say. The first presentation was on industrial livestock operations, especially a Union County egg operation containing 3.3 million chickens within a three-mile area. According to the speakers, industrial livestock operations only ‘work’ because they externalize costs (in terms of the enormous masses of unused and toxic manure) to local rural communities that suffer from water poisoning and soil degradation, the government subsidies that support the operations, and the lax enforcement of environmental regulations by government agencies. These arguments are widely known, especially by Oberlin students, but it was definitely new to me to hear them being made by people who lived in close proximity to a livestock operation, people who couldn’t get the smell out of their house and who couldn’t drink their own water (agriculture, especially livestock production being the largest source of Ohioan water pollution). The speakers also pointed out that industrial farms are relatively unhindered by typical health codes and laws- they operate without building codes and zoning concerns for health and quality of life issues. Transparency and the lax enforcement of Ohio EPA regulations was a major theme that would be revisited time and time again throughout the testimonials. For more information, check out the group Wood County Citizens Opposed to Factory Farms.

The next presentation was on industrial issues in East Toledo. The area is afflicted by a local oil refinery, with issues of stench, basic quality of life, and frequent sickness attributed to the refinery. In addition to its current burdens, there is a proposed coal coke plant which would further degrade Lake Erie water and local living conditions. This in a neighborhood, Harbor View, in which the average annual family income is $13,000. That is absurd on its own, let alone without factoring in the tremendous health costs the coke plant must bring with it, imposing huge burdens on an already afflicted community.

Unfortunately, the speaker from the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) who was supposed to tell us about farm worker exposure issues didn’t show up. While there were some latino members of the audience, I would really have liked to hear from Mr. Espinoza, as I’m not well informed regarding farm worker and immigrant EJ issues.

The next series of speakers discussed lead poisoning and cancer clusters, with lack of awareness and adequate information definitely a key concern. Lucas County (where the city of Toledo is located) is second in the state of Ohio for lead poisoning rates (after good old Cuyahoga), and there were a number of health professionals and building inspectors who talked about the laws and effects of lead poisoning. One of the most disturbing correlations was one found between levels of lead exposure and juvenile ‘delinquent’ behavior. Lead poisoning has many well known affects, typically lowering concentration and cognitive development as well as immune system strength, but there have recently been studies done that show a direct connection between lead poisoning, disruptive behavior in school, and juvenile incarceration and run-ins with the law. To make that clearer, lead poisoning, which is concentrated in poor, black, and latino communities, is strongly correlated with incarceration rates, school dropout rates, and the continuing cycle of underdevelopment of communities of color. This was one of the strongest indicators for me of the major connections between environmental health and quality, the cycles of poverty and the criminal justice system, and education- definitely connections that environmental justice is comfortable making, and the climate movement (and even ‘mainstream environmentalism’, if it hopes to be broadly relevant) must get used to as well. The EJ bill will hopefully include in it much stronger lead standards and regulations, which will hopefully, in tandem with other initiatives, facilitate the establishment of pathways out of poverty.

The cancer cluster presentations were simply horrifying. We heard from a couple parents out of Clyde in Sandusky County, one of whom had two children both with severe but theoretically treatable, cancer. These children were half-siblings, making it less likely that the cause is genetic. There are over 20 cancer-afflicted children in the area, an extremely large number considering that these children live in a town of only six thousand people. I couldn’t believe the strength of these parents bringing their stories to the EJ townhall, and was made aware of how critical not only criminal justice, but public health is to environmental justice (and will be to the climate movement in a larger sense.) The parents were clear that they did not have conclusive proof as to who was responsible for the cancer cluster- there are numerous potential point sources of pollution in the area, but studies have yet to be done identifying what in particular might be causing the increased incidence. On the other hand, they can’t yet say that anyone isn’t responsible, and stressed the need for quicker, more urgent study. They suggested that faster implementation of regulation and study, and checking up on communities be a part of the EJ bill, so that other communities won’t have to wait over a year (as did Clyde) to get some attention. Hopefully the EJ bill, when passed, will ensure that other communities receive a much more rapid response so that such clusters can be avoided.

The next speaker, one of Dr. Jenkins’ students, gave a short presentation on my favorite topic in the world, green jobs. He made the case for green jobs being essential not only in seeking justice and equity, but providing solutions to the EJ movement’s concerns, emphasizing how green jobs can bring a transformation of how we work, live, eat, and get around. Green jobs in renewable energy reduce the need for polluting and health-devastating coal plants, and can also facilitate the cleaning of water supplies, agricultural land, and blighted urban spaces. He cited that Toledo was once the glass-making capital of the US, and noted that Toledo’s industries are now making the transition from glass to solar PV (see more on Toledo as Ohio’s solar valley here- the speaker claimed it has already saved or created 10,000 jobs) manufacturing, definitely a heartening prospect for the region. Hopefully their example can be taken even farther throughout the state, facilitating leadership in wind turbine, plug-in/hybrid car, and public transportation manufacturing and repair. He also talked about brownfield cleanup and ecological restoration, both vital fields that are definitely among the least outsource-able of the green jobs and will contribute to greater environmental health and room for in-fill urban development, preventing sprawl and thus helping encourage infrastructure less intended for cars and more intended for people. It was definitely exciting hearing about this from a local person my own age, seeing how far the green jobs message has come and how meaningful it is to my generation.

Teresa Mills then spoke again on the Ohio EPA’s inability to function as a true protector of environmental health and quality. I didn’t manage to take down notes for all of what she said, but much of it was related to stuff we’d already heard: the lack of regulation of industrial livestock production, the minimal oversight and cozy relationship between the Ohio EPA, utilities, and manufacturers, and the Ohio EPA’s disturbing history of keeping information out of the public eye. In one whistle-blower’s account, Ohio EPA officials went so far as to avoid taking notes on a series of meetings with developers with the explicit purpose of making sure such meetings could not constitute the publicly available record. To re-state more boldly, the Ohio EPA held meetings that it knew were damaging to their image and credibility as a regulatory agency, so damaging as to necessitate avoiding leaving a significant paper trail. She ended her speech by urging us all to hold the state executive branch responsible, as the Ohio EPA is an arm of the governor’s will and vision for the state.

Finally, there was a representative of the IBEW (International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, I wish I remembered what local union) to talk about the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), and its relationship to environmental justice. He talked about how a lot of the environmental problems of the state can be related back to the narrow-minded bottom line, big business’ tendency to try and gain easy, simple profit regardless of external costs to communities. He also laid out the case that the labor movement has always been engaged in the aims of environmental justice, to ensure the health and welfare of local communities. Environmental justice needs to keep big business in check, and organized labor has historically been at the very front lines of that struggle, the first line of defense against pollution and damage to the community. More than that, labor represents the community, the workers, and the protection of living and family-supporting wage that is fundamental to the green jobs movement. He then laid out some basic information about EFCA, how it strengthens unions and workers that want to form unions, thus giving organized labor more tools to contest damaging big business practices, to stand up against pollution. For more information, see Citizen Obie’s EFCA Center page. Overall I thought he made a compelling case for stronger labor leading to stronger support for environmental justice within business. There are many groups like Green For All, the Apollo Alliance, and the Blue Green Alliance that are already working at creating these kinds of coalitions, and they will definitely prove to be extremely necessary as we climate activists and environmental justice activists work to broaden and strengthen our base.

Thus ended the citizen testimonials. There were a number of unscheduled testimonials that were great to hear, but I didn’t take adequate notes (being somewhat sleepy) and can’t put down a good record of them here. We heard from a number of legislators and some citizens that largely echoed the statements already made, but it was great hearing other voices making a contribution.

After this we would have stuck around for the student organizing session afterward, but it took a bit too long to really get stuff started and we had to go. We did at least put our names and contact information down on the sign-up sheet, and I’m confident that we’ll stay in touch with Dr. Jenkins and Mary Clare (of Ohioans for Health, Environment, and Justice- OHEJ, one of the organizers of the townhall) in the future. Overall it was a great experience, and I’ll try posting a succinct summary of my reflections tomorrow.

Next Up: Final Reflections, And What You Can Do!

Peace yall,

-Joel

Leave a Comment

Filed under Climate Movement, Coal, Democracy, Environmental Justice, Environmental Policy, Faith, Food Policy, Food Sovereignty, Global Warming and Poverty, Green Jobs, Health, Immigration Issues, Labor Issues, Ohio, Racial Issues, Youth Issues

University Of Toledo Environmental Justice Townhall Meeting, First Impressions And Introductions (Part 1)

What’s good yall? Yesterday I went to an environmental justice townhall meeting at the University of Toledo, and it was such a great experience I thought I’d share it with you. This first part of my account will deal with the opening of the townhall and some of my first impressions. The next post will deal with what was to me one of the most exciting parts of the townhall: the citizen testimonials.

Before the meeting itself began there was an open reception that was very reminiscent to me of post-service coffee hours at my old Episcopalian church, if coffee hour had an array of posters with maps of egg-production factory farms, statistics on lead poisoning throughout Toledo and wider Ohio, and lists of public schools affected by nearby point sources of pollution (primarily steel manufacturers, incinerators, coal plants, and water treatment plants). The atmosphere was extremely friendly, despite the topic. While some people were clearly visitors there was also a lot of familiarity, history, and community among a number of the people. Some were definitely connected through the University, but others seemed to come from nearby towns and rural communities, making up something of a Northwest Ohio environmental justice network. After meandering around for a bit picking up literature I went into the meeting itself.

One of the first things I noticed about the group was its age diversity. The group was racially diverse, as I was kind of expecting of an EJ crowd, but it was interesting to me how many undergrads, graduate students, middle aged, and elderly people there were. While I tend to associate environmentalism with a student and aging hippie crowd, the EJ townhall was a very different group. Parents, municipal representatives, government agency workers, and professors joined the good number of students my age and older. I found this really heartening. Sometimes it seems like especially with the climate movement it can often be dominated by younger voices (who are much more unanimously in favor of strong action than other age groups), but this townhall was very representative of a different kind of community- one occupied by families and elders as well as the young revolutionaries and hell-raisers.

The discussion started off with Morris Jenkins, a professor of criminal justice at the University, laying out the schedule of how the meeting was going to go. First off he introduced the backing panel (which mostly just asked participants some clarifying questions during their testimonials) and the townhall’s sponsors. Again, not unexpected for an EJ event, but the list included a diverse array of interest groups: chapters of the NAACP, the University of Toledo Departments of Criminal Justice and Women’s and Gender Studies, and a variety of public health groups, in addition to some more explicitly ‘environmental’ groups (though I struggle to call a group devoted to water quality and safety environmental). Then came some introductory remarks on Ohio’s history with environmental disasters, delivered by Teresa Mills, and a summary of the Ohio EJ bill, described by Ron Davis (the Ohio EJ bill will soon be receiving its own page at the top of the Citizen Obie site).

Mills’ presentation began with the burning of the Cuyahoga river but also brought up another series of environmental disasters in Ohioan history, and I’m sorry to say that there have been quite a lot of them, many of them unresolved to this day. While California is often associated with air pollution, I learned that Ohio is actually one of the most air pollution heavy states in the country, with among the highest concentration of coal plants as well. Also important is the fact that high-sulfur coal (which is more polluting and damaging to respiratory health) makes up 90% of Ohio power generation. Coal abuses aren’t confined to plants however. Meigs County, which is currently struggling to avoid the construction of a fifth coal plant, has had a number of instances in which coal mines were ‘cleaned’ via flooding, which brought toxins and other mining waste into the water table and the local soil. Finally, in order to demonstrate how the Ohio EPA has failed tor regulate poor behavior, Mills described one industrial plant that had had over 150 fires or explosions, not one of which was investigated by the Ohio EPA.

After this, Ron Davis described the process by which the Ohio EJ bill had come about. There was a 2007 EJ forum, I forget where, after which the participants all began the work of going around to various communities and organizations (in environment, justice, health, and many other sectors) to take suggestions and input as to the contents of the to-be-proposed EJ bill. Just as the townhall consisted especially of taking testimony, the EJ bill stands (as do the 17 EJ principles) as a representation of the diverse perspectives, voices, and needs of a wide variety of communities and co-existing groups and interests. The bill is still gathering legislative support and I’ll detail later, and on the page dedicated to the bill, how Oberlin can help push for strong legalization and implementation of EJ principles in Ohio.

The beginning of the townhall left me with a very good feeling. There were aspects of it that reminded me of the best parts of my time at Power Shift; a tangible diversity of background and perspective coupled with a friendliness, inclusivity, and complete absence of pretention that was refreshing in the extreme. The next stage would prove to be even more provocative and inspiring.

Next Up: Testimonials!

Peace yall,

-Joel

Leave a Comment

Filed under Climate Movement, Coal, Democracy, Environmental Justice, Environmental Policy, Food Policy, Food Sovereignty, Gender Issues, Global Warming and Poverty, Green Jobs, Health, Immigration Issues, Ohio, Racial Issues, Youth Issues